Publisher's Note
March 2063
Two years ago this publishing
house anonymously received a handwritten English manuscript. The note with it
stated that it was found among the possessions of a deceased elderly woman --
the purported author. She lived out her final years on an isolated farm
somewhere near the Sierra Madre mountains of Sonora, Mexico.
The contents of this manuscript --
now known as the Veronia Manuscript -- appear to present a record of the events
that led to the Great Uprising that occurred during the first quarter of this
century. The outcome of this tumultuous period is undeniably known to all. Yet,
the exact genesis of it is buried in the ashes of the strife itself, the forty
years since its conclusion and the dramatic social changes that resulted. As
such, it is reasonable to question the veracity of the Manuscript's contents.
Despite the Manuscript's rather
recent appearance, scholars have already devoted considerable effort towards
assessing its accuracy. The destructive intervention of the Great Uprising and
the many years since its formative period late in the 20th Century make
unequivocal authentication of all the information impractical. Despite this
impediment scholars have worked diligently to compare the Manuscript with extant
archival sources. Additionally, interviews have been conducted with the few
people still alive who might have knowledge of the events of the period.
The least scientific of the
information available is the immense body of un-substantiated folk lore that
surrounds the origins of the Great Uprising. Much of this lore involves the role
of Veronia. The manuscript's content has been compared to the lore.
The summary result of these studies
is that, when taken against the body of available information and factually
recorded history for the period, the most reputable of scholars find nothing in
the Veronia Manuscript that would cause them to take exception as to either the
existence of the people or the occurrence of the events as documented therein.
Of course, proof by lack of exception is tentative proof at best. Yet, the
critical scrutiny given to the facts reported in the Veronia Manuscript leads
this publisher to conclude that there is substantial basis for accepting the
material provided therein as true. The reader must form their own judgment.
The text that follows is the
unabridged version of the Veronia Manuscript.
“Of Common Flesh and Form” by R. L. Crepeau Copyright 1993